Skip to content
Halloween 2026Explore the community map

Peninsula Housing & Elections

California Warns Menlo Park Must Amend Housing Plan if Measure P Wins

The California Department of Housing and Community Development sent an Oct. 30 letter warning that voter approval of Measure P on Nov. 3 would require replacing downtown parking sites slated for 345 affordable units.

By Tri-Valley Weekly · Syndicated from Bay Area Chronicle
Syndicated reporting from Bay Area Chronicle · Bay Area Chronicle
Published · 3 min read

Downtown Menlo Park streetscape and residential housing architectural plans
California housing regulators notified Menlo Park on Oct. 30 that passage of Measure P on Nov. 3 would require the city to amend its housing element, where 3 of 8 downtown parking lots are slated for at least 345 below-market-rate homes. · Bay Area Chronicle Illustration
Your listening Queue & catch up
Unheard stories first, timed at 1×. Your selections stay first.

Add a story or build a catch-up queue to start listening.

The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) notified the city of Menlo Park in an Oct. 30 letter that if voters approve Measure P in Tuesday's Nov. 3 election, the city will be required to amend its state-certified housing element, according to reporting by Arden Margulis in The Almanac.

As of Friday, Oct. 30, the San Mateo County Elections Office reported that 28% of registered Menlo Park voters had already returned their ballots.

Downtown Parking Plazas and the 345-Unit Affordable Housing Plan

Coordinated by the group Save Downtown Menlo, Measure P would require citywide voter approval before Menlo Park can repurpose or significantly reduce parking across 8 city-owned downtown parking lots.

Three of those 8 downtown parking lots are designated in Menlo Park's state-approved housing element for the construction of at least 345 below-market-rate affordable housing units, with replacement parking structures incorporated into the developments. Under the city's current proposal, Menlo Park would lease the downtown land to an affordable housing developer for $1 per year over a 55-year lease term. City analyses indicate the project still faces an estimated local funding gap of $19 million to $45 million that would need to be filled by city contributions or outside philanthropy.

In its Oct. 30 letter, HCD stated that requiring a second citywide ballot measure before those downtown parking lots can be developed introduces a new governmental constraint. If Measure P passes on Nov. 3, Menlo Park must revise its housing element to either demonstrate that the downtown lots remain viable or identify alternative sites with equivalent capacity. HCD previously sent a similar warning letter in August before the Menlo Park City Council selected a developer.

Arguments From Measure P Opponents and Supporters

Campaign leaders and City Council District 4 candidates offered sharply contrasting interpretations of HCD's Oct. 30 letter:

  • No on P Campaign and District 4 Candidate Charlotte Reed: Karen Grove, a leader of the No on P campaign and former Menlo Park housing commissioner, warned that amending the housing element is an expensive, multi-year process that could result in HCD decertifying the city's housing plan. Decertification could expose Menlo Park to state fines, loss of affordable housing grants, and "builder's remedy" applications — which allow developers to bypass local zoning limits, as occurred in 2024 before the city's housing element was certified, when a developer filed an application for a high-rise project at 80 Willow Road. District 4 candidate Charlotte Reed likewise opposed Measure P, arguing that losing housing element certification would strip the city of local land-use authority.
  • Measure P Proponent Alex Beltramo and District 4 Candidate Laura Melahn: Measure P proponent Alex Beltramo and District 4 candidate Laura Melahn argued that HCD's letter confirms passage of Measure P will not trigger immediate decertification on Wednesday morning, giving the city time to identify alternative sites for affordable housing without eliminating surface parking for downtown merchants and shoppers.

Sources

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought on this story.